View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2008
GeneralJinjur's Avatar
GeneralJinjur GeneralJinjur is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
I have heard that too, Pesto - but those who have Vista have said there is nothing that comes close to Digital Image in the edting software included with Vista
Agreed. We installed Vista on one computer when it came out and I played around with its photo editing. What a waste of time! I get the equivalent "features" when I upload photos to be printed at Sam's or Costco. I was pretty ticked that Microsoft considered this to be an adequate replacement for DIS.

I have been playing around with GIMP (it's free), but I still mostly prefer DIS. GIMP has better shadow management, so that's nice for digiscrapping. I also like the way I can open and use .PSD templates in GIMP, but DIS is way better for quick photo editing. I would like to be competent in the replacement software before DIS stops working and I'm up a creek. I figure I have quite a few more years of happy DIP/DISing ahead of me before it won't work with a newer operating system.

Come to think of it, I should have tried installing it on the Vista computer. The whole family hated it so thoroughly that we wiped the hard drive and started over with Windows XP, which means I can't try that now. DIS might work just fine in Vista.
Reply With Quote TOP